Challenging the
honesty of this court’s procedures:
British Royal
Courts of Justice Chambers Division London:
To Master
Teveson, and the Court Manager:
Date: August
14, 2017:
This claim is
about, or should be about a living person’s daily life:
Where does
this court stand on “Human Rights?” A timely written response is requested
by the
claimant within the next 14 days.
Please reply
using first class post and recorded delivery to the claimant: Stated by
yourselves to be “Litigant in Person”.
Mrs J,
Margaret Clarke 28 Feilden Court Kingsclere Ns Newbury Berkshire RG20 5PG:
Key evidence contained
in both these defence documents still stand. Master Teveson will have them on
his file, just as I have both on my file.
These are the two defence documents that should have been properly
accounted for by Master Teveson and myself, which we together should have been
given the time to go through at the next hearing in these proceedings. Until
these two documents are allowed to be included and worked through properly in
my claim. I am being denied true justice.
The corrupt colluded working
practices of the three male defendants, who it is estimated have been working
as professional business men as now same, since 1965: Over the last 52 years:
How many other people have they been ripped off same in the Chichester and
London area over the last 52 years? At
least 50 family members related within the Goodger - McDowall families are
known to be shocked- amazed- that the like of this is allowed to be going on. What
can any of the family victims expect to get back from financial fraud the like
of this? A lethal self-regulated justice system. Does Master Teveson make a habit of getting
all defendants to do all his work for him as is the case here? Claimant
FIRST HEARING: THE DEFENDANTS TWO
DOCUMENTS DATED OCTOBER 20, 2010:
THE TWO FAKE DEFENDANTS DOCUMENT:
1. Defendants
Skeleton Argument.
2. Defendants
fake copy of District Judge Davis’s Chichester County Court Judgement.
These two prepared defendants
documents were, and still are written proof that showed the corruption of the
first claim Inheritance claim given to
both Teverson and Mrs Clarke and should by rights Teverson
defence documents handed by defence barrister Stephen
Lloyd to both Master Teveson
1. Defendants and
Mrs Clarke
IAN BROCK PETERKIN: ANDREW DUNLOP:
STEPHEN LLOYD:
This all started in the 1950’s when
the mothers’ divorce proceedings got underway.
What was the reason it took three
years before the “First Court Hearing” took place on October 20, 2010?
December 14, 2007 – October 20, 2010:
All defendants are “Bloodhorse Illiterate”.
Claim placed
in this court on December 14, 2007 by Charles Hoile Newbury.
Three male
defendants colluded corruption perjury libel and slander:
Timeline: The opening hearing of this claim October 20,
2010: At this first hearing
Why and how
did this claim come to take 3 years to reach the
“First Hearing” at this first hearing defence
barrister Stephen Lloyd in this court?
LETTER TO TEVERSON HONESTY TRUST
One would expect a British Court to be honest and
trustworthy. The truth is however it is
nothing of the sort.
A request letter to Master Teverson.
Please arrange through this, your court, to provide me with
the following defendant’s documents. Please post them yourself First Class
Post, Recorded Delivery to Mrs J Margaret Clarke 28 Feilden Court Kingsclere Nr
Newbury Berkshire RG20 5PG.
TAX YEARS APRIL 2010
TO APRIL 2011
TAX YEARS APRIL 2011
TO APRIL 2012
TAX YEARS APRIL 2012 TO APRIL 2013
TAX YEARS APRILO 2013 TO APRIL 2014
TAX YEARS APRIL 2014 TO APRIL 2015
TAX YEARS APRIL 2015 TO APRIL 2016
TAX YEARS APRIL 2016 TO APRIL 2017
TAX YEARS 2012
TAX YEARS 2013
TAX YEARS 2014
TAX YEARS 2015
Brain Chase Coles Basingstoke representing
the claimant Mrs J Margaret Clarke from 1996 to 2000, over these five years.
Charles Hoile Newbury from 2001 to
2010. Leading to the claimant acting alone as termed by court “Litigant in Person” .
DEFENDANTS’ COLLUSION TO DEFRAUD
TIMELINE: IAN BROCK PETERKIN THE MOTHERS SOLICITOR.
ANDREW DUNLOP THE MOTHERS ACCOUNTANT NOT THE CLAIMANTS
SOLICITOR. ACCOUNTABLE HERE 1950 – 2015
OVER THESE LAST 65 YEARS
JANE GUMMER THE CLAIMANTS TWIN
SISTER.
It would appear that
most children grow to trusts their mother and father, or not as the case maybe.
Perhaps Peterkin,
Dunlop and Jane Gummer can explain best why such trust evaporates?
Perhaps Bloodhorse
Illiterate Peterkin, Dunlop and Jane
Gummer can explain best “fundamentally unjust” and “completely illogical”
The Claimant, Mrs J Margaret Clarke, describes aspects of
her claim going back to the 1950’s when her parent’s marriage broke down,
described by the claimant as “deeply troubling” for the mother to live through.
On top of the fact that she had three daughters On top of the fact that the
mother’s brother Charles Goodger jnr, shot himself, his death causing deep
sadness obviously, to the whole family.
The death of the
father in October 1977 and his Will. The Claimant, Mrs J Margaret Clarke’s
legal marathon investigation started soon after the mother’s death in October
1995. Has led to
that led to rider Michael Stainton being banned for two
years as “deeply troubling” , while lawyers representing Towcester chief executive Kevin Ackerman
branded the BHA disciplinary panel’s findings as “fundamentally unjust”
and “completely illogical”
the claimant in her teens then.
marathon investigation
Tuesday Oct 13 2015 lee mottershead 13 10 15
The Professional Jockeys Association, yesterday described
aspects of the marathon investigation that led to rider Michael Stainton being
banned for two years as “deeply troubling” , while lawyers representing Towcester chief executive Kevin Ackerman
branded the BHA disciplinary panel’s findings as “fundamentally unjust”
and “completely illogical”
TEVERSON 28.08.15
TO MASTER TEVERSON FROM CLAIMANT MRS J. MARGARET CLARKE 28
FEILDEN COURT KINGSCLERE. RG20 5PG
Royal Courts of Justice Chambers Division London
Claim Number:
Charles Hoile Solicitors Newbury posted my claim to the
Royal Court
of
Justice London Chambers Division on
December 14 2007 a total of nearly eight years ago. I am what this court tells
me “A Female Litigant in Person”. Poverty,
and dishonest fraudulent male trustee manipulation left ongoing after my
father’s death in October 1977, throughout and to date over what is now 48
years. Peterkin and Dunlop my late mothers advisors. Please take notice that I have never employed
Peterkin, Dunlop or Lloyd to do anything for me.
Master Teverson, since
December 14, 2007 to April 5, 2011 supposedly
handling my claim, has and is colluding with the three male defendants,
Peterkin, Dunlop and Lloyd behind my back since April 2011, over the last four years, four months.
Request for Tax Form R185’s needed as a matter of urgency
please, as follows from this court yourself Master Teverson. That you keep an
exact copy of these documents.
Please handle whatever this is through my claim. It has been
noted
Tax Years April 6 2012 to April 5, 2013
Tax Years April 6 2013 to April 5, 2014
Tax Years April 6 2014 to April 5, 2015
Tax Years April 6 2015 to April 5, 2016
BROKEN HOME 1950’S
FEMALE HANDICAP:
It is noted that political and legal British male’s in the years from October 1977
throught to date August 2015, consider the female of the species
Especially matter such as this to
be left going on. I find that my claim has been maneuvered about by 5 male’s to
include Master Tevcerson, one of which has since died in a secretive fraudulent
and abusive way
Please find two copy letters enclosed herewith. The enclosed
letter
Since April 2011 Please find the letter enclosure from Bennett
Griffin dated 27 August 2015. Plus a copy letter enclosure from Basingstoke and
Deane dated 13 August 2015.
I find this an
excessive period of time for FRAUDULENT TRUSTEES court to play such abusive legal games with
my life.
